4 ms·
Trivializes "ethical" AI. Countries and organizations are using facial recognition to decide what people are allowed to do, all sorts of opaque and life alterin
by version_five 4y ago
Trivializes "ethical" AI. Countries and organizations are using facial recognition to decide what people are allowed to do, all sorts of opaque and life altering decisions get made with ML, but people are concerned about whether a chatbot says "I" or an image generator over or under represents demographics in pictures of CEOs and homemakers or whatever. People suck at prioritizing and love to be fed a narrative.
- zzzeek 4y agoConvincing someone to kill themselves out of shame of upsetting an imagined being seems pretty life altering to me ...
- echelon 4y agoIf that worries you, it's not going to stop there. Just wait until the humanoid robots can pick up handguns. Worse - fragile world here - wait until humanoid robots become as cheap as drones and everyone can buy them. How many irresponsible drone pilots and drivers do you see? Just wait until they can have humanoid bodies walking around at their disposal. We might have a lot of accidents due to sheer stupidity rather than malice.
- vasco 4y agoNot humanoid but https://youtu.be/0rliFQ0qyAM https://youtu.be/0rliFQ0qyAM
- echelon 4y agoWow. Reminds me of https://youtu.be/9fa9lVwHHqg https://youtu.be/9fa9lVwHHqg
- zzzeek 4y agoFluid access to handguns and military style weapons is an intractable problem with nothing more than the example of virtually every industrialized nation on earth besides the US to go on for hints towards improvement. AI wielding handguns is nothing , wait until they build skynet and invent time travel. Might as well give up now
- fanagra32 4y agoThat can easily be solved by outlawing them. Just like it has been solved with handguns everywhere except the U.S. which keeps refusing to realize that their 2nd amendmend is just harmful. Luckily it's about guns and not about robots, so at least they will be able to regulate that.
- tedunangst 4y agoSeems we should ban the word "you" instead in that case.
- wmf 4y agoMultiple things can be worked on at the same time.
- crop_rotation 4y agoIn theory, yes. In reality, everyone has limited time and energy and it is important to ensure that the pressing problems are not ignored to make time for much less important problems.
- echelon 4y ago> People suck at prioritizing and love to be fed a narrative. The loud attention seekers do. They're not a majority unless you measure and determine it to be the case. I strongly suspect they're not.
- morelisp 4y agoGoogle et al fired everyone working on the wicked ethical problems, now there's only the ones you can throw in a KPI and show "improvement" on.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]