3 ms·
No disagreement there. But since we agree they're just serving a need, maybe let's not pretend that this automatically gives them the God-given right to destro
by schiffern 4y ago
No disagreement there.
But since we agree they're just serving a need, maybe let's not pretend that this automatically gives them the God-given right to destroy the planet[0], and that the regulators are being unfair by taking it away?
You might re-read my post above. I cleaned it up a bit, so maybe my intent is more clear now.
[0] if it helps, substitute the phrase "other people's property" here