>which in both cases mean you spend less of your revenue on labor, which means "less jobs". You can't view things in the void like this, though. Reducing the o

>which in both cases mean you spend less of your revenue on labor, which means "less jobs". You can't view things in the void like this, though. Reducing the overall cost of doing something makes it viable for more businesses, which means more jobs. We have more jobs in software development overall now because of how much more productive it is today, which opens up so many more viable use cases for it. We have more CG artists for movies, games, etc. now in large part because more efficient workflows and more powerful software have increased productivity. Will it be the same thing with generative AI? I think so, at least for the foreseeable future.