5 ms·
The Chinese Room thought experiment is not convincing to software engineers generally. It relies heavily on an intuition that looking things up in a book is cle
by barrkel 4y ago
The Chinese Room thought experiment is not convincing to software engineers generally. It relies heavily on an intuition that looking things up in a book is clearly not "thinking". Software engineers know better: that "looking things up", if you can do it billions and trillions of times a second, can simulate a process which has a close correspondence to reasoning.
- smitty1e 4y agoCalculating a hash value for a string and hitting a lookup table hardly seems "thinking", even at scale.
- barrkel 4y agoAddition and multiplication are trivially implemented using lookup, if you had a machine without arithmetic and only control flow and memory operations. You don't need much more than that for matrix operations, and now you have ChatGPT, a decent simulation of apparent thinking - which is all that is necessary to kill the intuition dead.
- smitty1e 4y agoNot seeing how matrix operations == thinking, which was the point of the thought experiment.
- edgyquant 4y agoWhat is thinking if not a series of matrix operations? Your brain is just a huge network of neurons and their connections, is this not a (very complex) matrix?
- smitty1e 4y agoCertainly not in any mathematical sense. The discrete N-dimensional coefficients of a matrix are not modeled by neurons, their connections, and the quantum mechanical electrical accidents that (a) constitute one's wetware, and (b) aren't completely captured by gates and code. The map is still not the territory, sorry.