2 ms·
Do you think it takes as many people to build whatever software you want today vs in the 80s? I agree more software can be built with the improvements, but per
by vasco 4y ago
Do you think it takes as many people to build whatever software you want today vs in the 80s? I agree more software can be built with the improvements, but per unit of functionality, way less people are needed, or they can do it much faster, which in both cases mean you spend less of your revenue on labor, which means "less jobs".
- cthalupa 4y ago>which in both cases mean you spend less of your revenue on labor, which means "less jobs". You can't view things in the void like this, though. Reducing the overall cost of doing something makes it viable for more businesses, which means more jobs. We have more jobs in software development overall now because of how much more productive it is today, which opens up so many more viable use cases for it. We have more CG artists for movies, games, etc. now in large part because more efficient workflows and more powerful software have increased productivity. Will it be the same thing with generative AI? I think so, at least for the foreseeable future.
- Zvez 4y agotheir point is simple: during the last 20-30 years we had efficiency improvements by orders of magnitude. Still we didn't have developers jobs reduction in any way. We evolved into doing more and more high-level and high-scale jobs. So no, -10% of time needed to build the same unit of functionality won't lead to -10% reduction of workforce. It will change the scope of said workforce.