I think that's actually a more hopeful take than the reality. Instead, I think it's just a stuffed shirt bureaucratic box checkers who knows that no one ever g

I think that's actually a more hopeful take than the reality. Instead, I think it's just a stuffed shirt bureaucratic box checkers who knows that no one ever got fired for sending a book to a sensitivity reader engaging in some busy work to pad out their annual review accomplishments. The extremely low quality and incoherence of the bowdlerization shows their total indifference to both the book and any conceivable external agenda of the sensitivity edits. If it was being done to generate controversy at least it would stop when it stopped making them money.