> really assumes that the rich traveling are some how more meaningful No, it assumes you care about reducing air travel more than equality of access to it > f

> really assumes that the rich traveling are some how more meaningful No, it assumes you care about reducing air travel more than equality of access to it > forcing most people to become vegans because meat becomes too expensive Sounds...effective? It isn't what is happening, but taxing the hell out of meat would be a great lever to pull if you want to drive consumption away from it. Outside of cost the only possible lever is rationing. Good luck with that one.