> one could also proactively attempt to improve their community for everyone. Sure. I'm just saying attempt effectively. And don't forget everyone is not every

> one could also proactively attempt to improve their community for everyone. Sure. I'm just saying attempt effectively. And don't forget everyone is not everyone you like/agree with. > The author of the article, could have included a more inclusive preselective Eh? You want the article to better reflect that bisexsual dudes might want to think twice about moving to Saudi Arabia? One would assume that is common knowledge or at least the responsibility of the reader to further research. By the same token, some of the readers are conservative muslims. How does one simultaneously editorialize the article to be more inclusive/cater to them? I hope my point is clear. I don't believe a more inclusive preselective is logically possible in every situation, the broader the subject the less chance you have of pleasing every possible reader. Consider not spending your inclusivity tokens on every single thing you encounter simply because you'll run out. Spend wisely. :) P.S. - Please don't shoot the messenger.