3 ms·
> We need AIs to "sanity check" human output more than the other way round. On the contrary; we need AIs to "completeness check" the experts, because experts a
by gwd 4y ago
> We need AIs to "sanity check" human output more than the other way round.
On the contrary; we need AIs to "completeness check" the experts, because experts are prone to forget things or have missing knowledge; we need humans to "sanity check" the AIs because current LLMs are insane: mixed in with brilliant pieces of insight are super-obvious mistakes and outright hallucinations.
- p-e-w 4y agoMany human professionals are incompetent in ways that go beyond just "missing knowledge". This dramatically understates what a colossal problem incompetence is, and one that AIs don't appear to suffer from in the same way. Already with the current generation of AIs, and their strange mistakes and so-called hallucinations, I'd be hard pressed to say that they are overall worse than human professionals, considering what I've seen from those.