4 ms·
That's ironic, considering that in this case it was THE DOCTOR whose advice would have killed the patient, and ChatGPT who saved them. The pedestals that our s
by p-e-w 4y ago
That's ironic, considering that in this case it was THE DOCTOR whose advice would have killed the patient, and ChatGPT who saved them.
The pedestals that our society has put professionals on are going to start tumbling very soon now.
- aabhay 4y agoRight, just try being the one to make the injection based on a chatbot.
- rvz 4y ago> That's ironic, considering that in this case it was THE DOCTOR whose advice would have killed the patient, and ChatGPT who saved them. And surely one anecdote makes a black box AI very trustworthy and reliable against human doctors. /s > The pedestals that our society has put professionals on are going to start tumbling very soon now. Nope. Not even close. The OP did not treat the patient by themselves, they reviewed the output with a human doctor. I don't think even you yourself would begin to follow ChatGPT's advice and treat and inject yourself without input from an experienced human doctor based on ONE statistic of it saving someone's life especially them going to a second human doctor.