5 ms·
It seems they’re worried about peer to peer interactions. My experience regulating my daughters internet access is that interactions with other kids have the h
by pyuser583 4y ago
It seems they’re worried about peer to peer interactions.
My experience regulating my daughters internet access is that interactions with other kids have the highest potential for toxicity.
They seem ok with kids passively consuming a stream of adult generated content.
They’re also excluding SaaS which just emulates desktop software.
I think that’s about right.
- ipaddr 4y agoKids can be mean to each other, now or in your day. Next they ban kids from talking to each other in person or having friends. Is that the life you want for your daughter?
- MacsHeadroom 4y agoGuess we should ban all teens from stack overflow, LinkedIn, and hacker news because kids might have toxic interactions online if we don't. Let's also not mention how the only way to reliably do this is to require identity verification from all adults. Get ready to scan your drivers license to post on hacker news and every other site (except traditional news sites apparently).
- frob 4y agoUtah is small enough that some sites may just geoblock Utah. I know if I had to choose between collecting every user's ID ever and just adding a block list, I'd go with the second.
- pyuser583 4y agoHow do websites handle under 13s? Blocking the United States?
- pyuser583 4y agoI would support this. Downvote away.
- EGreg 4y agoApparently videoconferencing with kids is AOK while chats are not?