3 ms·
From the USDA source I cited: “While recreational hunting for feral swine is popular in many states, it is generally not considered an effective management opt
by swalling 4y ago
From the USDA source I cited:
“While recreational hunting for feral swine is popular in many states, it is generally not considered an effective management option. Significant population reductions typically do not occur and feral swine behaviors or movements may be altered such that they impede other removal operations (e.g., trapping). Hunters usually target large males instead of females, which has little impact on overall population reduction. Additionally, recreational hunting creates incentives to maintain feral swine on the landscape and move feral swine to new areas for increased hunting opportunities, which has largely been attributed to the expansion of feral swine across the United States. Although controversial, several states have outlawed hunting in attempts to better manage feral swine populations. Research has shown that feral swine removal via hunting is often negated by the use of bait to attract feral swine. The supplemental food source increases fecundity and population growth despite hunter harvest.”
- cryptonector 4y agoIn Texas there's enough food for the feral hogs. That's why they're here. The amount of trapping and hunting cannot make much of a dent in their populations, and there's no need to bait them -- affected farmers and ranchers know that they are affected. Hunters do not hunt males to the exclusion of females because there's no time to decide their sex and which to target, you just shoot the ones you can.