3 ms·
LOL, according to this, my family's group text thread is illegal under this law, as DMs can only be between 2 people. EDIT: serious question; would Slack be pr
by UnpossibleJim 4y ago
LOL, according to this, my family's group text thread is illegal under this law, as DMs can only be between 2 people.
EDIT: serious question; would Slack be professional networking or, how does that work under this bill? It's DMing for business, but it isn't really networking.
- hattmall 4y agoGroup chats wouldn't be illegal, that's not an online service where you sign up and make a profile etc. This applies only to sites that would serve you random content from random users... i.e. Social Media.
- eyelidlessness 4y agoMost Slack usage I’m aware of doesn’t fit the description, but some does. Quite a lot of Discord usage however…
- 8note 4y agoThat would not need a carve out for private messages between two profiles
- dragonwriter 4y ago> as DMs can only be between 2 people. Nothing in the law restricts to DMs being between two people, it just distinguishes them from public content.
- judge2020 4y agoAs I understand it, > (I) shared between the sender and the recipient; 171 (II) only visible to the sender and the recipient; and 172 (III) are not posted publicly; maybe sender and recipient can be considered a group chat with multiple recipients? Otherwise you wouldn't classify something like Kik or Discord as social media.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]