3 ms·
None of which clearly protect GH or SO, the subjects of this thread branch.
by falcolas 4y ago
None of which clearly protect GH or SO, the subjects of this thread branch.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> None of which clearly protect GH or SO, the subjects of this thread branch. I disagree, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35310413 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35310413 (especially considering that because this law creates a penalty, and because it restricts speech, its definitions of the covered parties and conduct must be read narrowly – and its exceptions read broadly [0] – per the rule of lenity in statutory construction.) [0] if, in the first instance, it is Constitutional at all.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]