3 ms·
They said In 20 years, suggesting it's not possible today. Seems reasonable to me that AI will be able to produce better quality content (books, video, music) t
by thunky 4y ago
They said In 20 years, suggesting it's not possible today. Seems reasonable to me that AI will be able to produce better quality content (books, video, music) than humans at some point.
I'm looking forward to having my own personal music stream that nobody else will ever hear.
- rchaud 4y agoThe premise is the same as saying people can 3D-print their own widgets, nuts and bolts. The average person cannot do that to any reasonable level without a template that includes the right parameters. Templated entertainment fails because the viewer can see the ending coming a mile away. It is the same with anything where AI is expected to fill the gaps. With a 3D print template you get something generic that just works. The last thing that people want in entertainment is something whose ending they can predict. Writing screenplays is a skill, and AI provided by large corporations can only fine tune their output on the basis of whatever is out there, and the generic massively outweighs the original. Which side will AI go with?
- barking_biscuit 4y ago>They said In 20 years, suggesting it's not possible today. It's not exactly far away today. The building blocks are there. They're weak, but they are all fundamentally there. My wife loves the show SWAT and I used Stable Diffusion to insert her into some still shots of the show in place of Chris and she lost her mind. I'm seeing people getting some pretty good results with video-to-video techniques using ControlNet, so my next experiment is going to be to see if I can do it with video, and use Eleven Labs to clone the voice and replace that too. I'm virtually certain personalized entertainment of this nature is coming, and it's going to be huge.