Gina's point is true but also ignores human nature. Google has done two very interesting things: 1. They endorsed and accepted, internally, a moral test for c

Gina's point is true but also ignores human nature. Google has done two very interesting things: 1. They endorsed and accepted, internally, a moral test for corporate decision making 2. They milked this policy for a shit load of press. So for every "huh, what a great company!" they earned on the front end of the wave, now they must pay back a "hey, what about the whole thing about..." for every new act that seems incompatible with that moral absolute. Does that make for good commentary? Maybe not. But it was inevitable.