5 ms·
It works for everyone, due to conservation of mass and conservation of energy
by voldacar 4y ago
It works for everyone, due to conservation of mass and conservation of energy
- ac2u 4y agoIt's obvious even from the message you're replying to that they meant "works" in a manner that encompasses compliance. But don't let you already knowing that get in the way of a pointless quip implying that they need educated in thermodynamics.
- voldacar 4y agoIf you try and fail to eat less food, the correct conclusion is not that eating less food "doesn't work"
- paulryanrogers 4y agoThere is more to trying than being told. Also the level of effort/sacrifice to have the same impact with vary by age and individual.
- exfatloss 4y agoTrust me, I'm the most OCD guy ever. I literally just ate the same meal every day for 5 months. I've tried the craziest diets. Compliance is not the problem in people like me. It's something metabolic.
- orangepurple 4y agoI tried and failed to eat less food for decades. Ultimately it was total abstinence for many hours at a time that proved to be sustainable and actually easy after 3 months.
- exfatloss 4y agoI think it is, if it is being recommended to the person to lose weight.
- exfatloss 4y agoYou're thinking of CICO, not eating less. They have nothing to do with each other.