In the complaint we can see she tested at just 18 nanograms. Utterly negligent. > No one explained the details of the test results to Kaitlin at the time, but

In the complaint we can see she tested at just 18 nanograms. Utterly negligent. > No one explained the details of the test results to Kaitlin at the time, but Kaitlin later learned that the second test conducted on her urine sample reported a finding of 18 nanograms of codeine per milliliter of the sample (18 ng/mL). The laboratory testing Kaitlin’s sample employed a cutoff of 10 ng/mL to determine whether a sample was positive for codeine, a testing cutoff level that is dramatically lower than recommended in Federal guidelines. https://www.aclu-nj.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/kaitlin_k_complaint_redacted.pdf https://www.aclu-nj.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/...