3 ms·
There's a further subtlety -- the US would like to retain the capability to do this work without funding the entirety of the work itself. A lot of the expertis
by ISL 4y ago
There's a further subtlety -- the US would like to retain the capability to do this work without funding the entirety of the work itself. A lot of the expertise and infrastructure is unique and world-class.
In my view, the entire field is on pause awaiting the development of truly transformative accelerator technology, then it's off to the races again.
"In that sense, this new knowledge has all to do with honor and country but it has nothing to do directly with defending our country except to help make it worth defending." -- Wilson.
- prpl 4y agoPlasma Wakefield and “accelerator in a chip” are those breakthroughs that are expected to mature soon, though accelerator on a chip would be pointing more towards new applications
- javajosh 4y ago>would like to retain the capability to do this work without funding the entirety of the work itself Oh, then that's easy: just pay them to keep reading work in the field, maybe write a blog, and get into the theoretical side. I'm sure plenty of folks would jump at the opportunity to be on "professional standby" in a field they find fascinating.
- lazide 4y agoUnfortunately that just attracts fakers/scammers, as it’s the perfect role for them. They get to act all high and valuable, but there is no concrete verifiable output expected to be able to tell if they really are able to do what they say or not. At least until whatever situation you’re hoping to hedge against happens - then you’ll find out you’re being scammed, but far too late.