3 ms·
Technically it's true. But Lisp-like language (e.g. Scheme) is so minimal, to a point that everyone basically invented their own DSL inside it to get the jobs d
by raincole 4y ago
Technically it's true. But Lisp-like language (e.g. Scheme) is so minimal, to a point that everyone basically invented their own DSL inside it to get the jobs done. And the you ended up with a minimal language... and several sub-languages.
- thrown123098 4y ago[dead]
- smitty1e 4y agoSo The Famous Article seems a binning of functionality against three areas: (a) language core (b) standard library (c) real-world problem space. Functionality moves (c) => (b) => (a). Unless it's a DSL, the osmotic power is strong.