4 ms·
For sure - but when do we start asking it? Not to be too dramatic, but you and I agree we can simulate the same computation a small bundle of neurons can accomp
by jmoak3 4y ago
For sure - but when do we start asking it? Not to be too dramatic, but you and I agree we can simulate the same computation a small bundle of neurons can accomplish to a high degree of confidence, right?
If we can simulate a metric butt ton of them and get emergent behaviors somewhat similar to human computation, how can we guarantee that this simulated collection of these computing units isn’t “feeling” close to what a human feels? We’re just large collections of computing units as well.
I’m not quite saying we’re there yet though.
This whole development has really ruined my appetite for eating things that have intelligence.
- darkwraithcov 4y agoThe problem is, because of how these models were trained, how do we know if its telling us how it feels vs how it thinks we want it to respond?
- khochesh_kushat 4y agoI can't even prove that for sure about other people.
- psychoslave 4y ago>but you and I agree we can simulate the same computation a small bundle of neurons can accomplish to a high degree of confidence, right? The important word is simulate. It means it can accomplish a common subset of measurable phenomena. It certainly doesn't mean they are on pare on ontological status as a whole. The debate seems to easily confuse notions like living entities, consciousness and intelligence, when they are three orthogonal considerations.