3 ms·
As someone outside of the anglosphere who has been consuming news from left-leaning sources, there is a sudden shift in the type of language used and the kind o
by peanutcrisis 4y ago
As someone outside of the anglosphere who has been consuming news from left-leaning sources, there is a sudden shift in the type of language used and the kind of topics that would make it to the headlines. This is an observable phenomena, and when news is conveyed to make facts appear to imply only a specific set of outcomes (i.e. stretching your case), calling it non-neutral seems justified. As such, I think it's odd to characterize anyone who recognizes this as a solipsist.
An example of how sophistry allows one to preserve facts while conveying a narrative that does not entail from them: https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2022/04/17/yes-virginia-the-new-york-times-is-woke/ https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2022/04/17/yes-virginia-the-n...
- hayst4ck 4y ago> sudden shift in the type of language used and the kind of topics that would make it to the headlines. I am going to assume that is true and assume your judgement is correct. Why do you think that is the case? What is your model for why there was a change in "neutrality"?