3 ms·
…Or that Haskell, with arguably the most sophisticated type system in the world is considered less strongly typed than Ruby! The graph makes no sense to me.
by sambeau 15y ago
…Or that Haskell, with arguably the most sophisticated type system in the world is considered less strongly typed than Ruby!
The graph makes no sense to me.
- sambeau 15y ago"Standard ML, Objective Caml and Haskell have purely static type systems, in which the compiler automatically infers a precise type for all values. These languages (along with most functional languages) are considered to have stronger type systems than Java, as they permit no implicit type conversions" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_typing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_typing