3 ms·
Actually cost is why companies are doing research into things like this. Carbon emissions are a problem for heavy industries in the sense that it will raise the
by jillesvangurp 4y ago
Actually cost is why companies are doing research into things like this. Carbon emissions are a problem for heavy industries in the sense that it will raise their cost and this is something they have to address mid to long term.
Meanwhile electricity prices are not a constant and trending down. It might be too expensive now but at some point it might actually become the cheaper option if cost continues to drop. Also, large energy users, like steel plants, would probably end up investing in their own energy generation. Wind, solar, maybe even nuclear. That turns electricity from a variable cost into a fixed cost for them. So, it's not as clear cut that electrifying their processes is long term more expensive. It might actually turn around and become the cheaper option. Carbon taxes of course might make this attractive sooner.
But even if it were more expensive, another reason for investing in de-carbonizing steel would be that there is actually a growing demand for companies to source their materials from companies that have lower carbon emissions. Steel is used by a lot of companies and those companies too are looking to clean up their supply lines.
And of course because some companies are researching and trying different options here, other companies now need to worry about having a plan when their competitors start producing cleaner and cheaper steel.
All good reasons for companies to be investing in this now rather than in 30 years.
- ethbr0 4y agoMy naive impression is that heavy industry is (and has been) doing a lot of research into aligning their processes with more intermittent future energy characteristics. I.e. moving from a "we want to run the plant at optimal efficiency, damn the load pattern" to "we want to be able to optimize by following energy costs, even if that means we need to idle sometimes" Processes were very well optimized for the former, hence the greenfield for research into the latter.
- fbdab103 4y ago>even if that means we need to idle sometimes Is that even possible? For a huge industrial process like a steel mill, I think the capital and operational costs are so massive you want to run them continuously. Even "turning the plant on" could take many hours to get everything to temperature and stable.
- ethbr0 4y agoThat's where the temperature requirements come in. Afaik, they're the prime driver of intermittent-tolerance.
- tomatotomato37 4y agoThe pandemic showed industry that even if they wanted constant input & output it isn't guaranteed, and if you have to shutdown processes either because of grid issues or because a logistical quagmire is interrupting ore supply it's still a shutdown.