2 ms·
They likely (IANAL) had a much firmer legal footing in those cases.
by leoc 4y ago
They likely (IANAL) had a much firmer legal footing in those cases.
- leoc 4y agoAlso, I should add: I don't think Cloudflare is letting IPFS or the IPFS movement or whatever down, here. The protocol was deliberately designed not to force users to touch illegal or otherwise "hot" content against their knowledge or against their wills, and on the other side of that coin it doesn't provide them much to hide behind legally or otherwise if they do host it. That question is effectively out of scope for base IPFS, and Cloudflare isn't doing anything unexpected or especially treacherous in complying with copyright takedown requests.