4 ms·
I agree for some of them atleast.. although some of them probably dont necessarily need an explicit explanation because they are kind of self-explanatory. For e
by VoidWhisperer 4y ago
I agree for some of them atleast.. although some of them probably dont necessarily need an explicit explanation because they are kind of self-explanatory. For example, their prohibiting of processing for SEO related things (likely because much of this is spam) could use an explanation, but the cases for things that are inherently illegal or could get stripe sued might not
- weird-eye-issue 4y agoWhat SEO related things?
- cobertos 4y ago"Search engine optimization" is prohibited in Mexico. A close cousin "Marketing lead generation services" is prohibited in Hong Kong and Singapore as well as blanket prohibited as a "no value added service" where you sell or resell something with no value add.
- weird-eye-issue 4y agoDefinitely a lot of this is scammy but not all of it Like if you create a website and a fake business for the sole purpose of getting leads for "landscapers in Austin" then yeah I'd be fine banning that But if you have a site with high quality information about landscaping and you have a widget on a page that answers somebody's question about landscaping that lets people find a landscaper near them then that's fine with me
- VoidWhisperer 4y agoAh I think my sleep deprived brain read 'Sales of online traffic or engagement' as something related to SEO and it isn't inherently associated. My bad :)