3 ms·
I know, I find it strange that they didn’t make something better way sooner considering the ressource they had: scientists, computing, data, money. It seem to
by alfor 4y ago
I know, I find it strange that they didn’t make something better way sooner considering the ressource they had: scientists, computing, data, money.
It seem to me they prefered to keep it closed, away from the public, the questions, the risks.
If Google has AGI, or just basic AI with all the data they have on everyone, it’s a giant spying machine on much of the world and with a monopoly on web advertizing.
I think they had the golden goose and didn’t want to risk anything, just keep it going as long as possible.
What do you think? /Tinfoil hat off.
- verdverm 4y agoI think they are being more cautious than rushing a chatbot that has hallucinations. They do have access to better real time data, Bard is in beta I think we shouldn't jump to conclusions, things are just getting started. Revisit the question in 3 years