> I've had some misses with OpenAI, but this was an excellent answer. I've also had some misses with Google, but this turned out to be something they surfaced e

> I've had some misses with OpenAI, but this was an excellent answer. I've also had some misses with Google, but this turned out to be something they surfaced excellent link for, too. Think about the bias - maybe you were able to verify that the answer was excellent because you already knew the laws? Or you Googled and compared it? In both cases, ChatGPT did not perfom alone in providing validity. It kinda gave a summary for search results of Google, or for your pre-knowledge. Imagine if someone who does not know the laws, asks about them. ChatGPT cannot offer any validity alone for the user, at least yet. ChatGPT provides often excellent answers, I am not denying it. But the bad 5% ruins everything if they sound alike for the correct 95%, and if ChatGPT cannot provide any validity for them, at least yet. Often you ask things you don’t know or haven’t searched before.