>do you think there is any risk to a user of those third party service providers going under and not returning capital (either due to slashing risk or normal bu

>do you think there is any risk to a user of those third party service providers going under and not returning capital (either due to slashing risk or normal business risk)? Of course, but it's more like an email provider going under and you losing your inbox than a bad mortgage (which isn't to say that it's exactly the same, because blockchain assets are practically treated as currency, but clearly doesn't map onto the traditional understanding of securitization).