2 ms·
For code - I can read the code and verify myself... If I was asking whether the sky is blue or some other kind of "fact" based question sure... But really how i
by taf2 4y ago
For code - I can read the code and verify myself... If I was asking whether the sky is blue or some other kind of "fact" based question sure... But really how is that different with search? I can look at the website and say ah I trust this website over that other website... I think it's a new flavor of "don't trust everything you hear on the TV" Or in more modern day "Don't trust everything you read on the internet", or "Don't trust everything you hear on social media"... It's just the next iteration... "Don't trust everything an AI tell you". That is no different from me learning from code i find via search but instead ask about via AI...
- nicce 4y ago> "Don't trust everything you read on the internet", or "Don't trust everything you hear on social media" There is a difference. There are places with reputation and backlogs and even with scientific references. But if AI just gives you a text, there is nothing. Until they fix references, you can’t really use it for anything factual, non-logical information.
- taude 4y agoIf these were the case, then why would "fake news" be a thing?
- nicce 4y agoFake news are exactly the current state of the A.I. presentation. Confident expressions without proper referencing. People also like that their own opinions are validated, regardless of the truth. Which is also another thing why fake news success. I would say that fake news is an excellent example why current Chatbots might not be so good, as they express information in similar way.