This case might appear to support your position, but other cases do not. My intent was to show that the courts have indeed ruled on what is and isn't a religio

This case might appear to support your position, but other cases do not. My intent was to show that the courts have indeed ruled on what is and isn't a religious belief generally, which is contrary to your position. In any case, beliefs have to be religious in nature, not personal or based on reason or 'science' or what have you.