> You're quoting the outputs of a propaganda industry, not the outputs of credible independent research. One man's propaganda is another man's truth, and vice

> You're quoting the outputs of a propaganda industry, not the outputs of credible independent research. One man's propaganda is another man's truth, and vice versa. Do you really think the EPI is credible? https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/economic-policy-institute/ https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/economic-policy-in... > These are the orgs who persistently try to sell trickle-down economics That's ironic, given that the phrase "trickle-down" was invented by leftists as a marketing tactic: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/thomas-sowell-on-the-trickle-down-myth-workers-are-always-paid-first-and-then-profits-flow-upward-later-if-at-all/ https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/thomas-sowell-on-the-trickle-... > low regulation Well, we can agree on that one at least. > and other discredited, disastrous, and irrational neoliberal policy argument Never mind. I guess we have nothing to agree on. > Many are also enthusiastic climate change denialists. You're clearly influenced by the outputs of a propaganda industry, not the outputs of credible independent research. See what I did there? I'll even one-up you with some links: https://www.amazon.com/Unsettled-Climate-Science-Doesnt-Matters/dp/1950665798 https://www.amazon.com/Unsettled-Climate-Science-Doesnt-Matt... https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmism-Hurts/dp/0063001691 https://www.amazon.com/Apocalypse-Never-Environmental-Alarmi... https://www.amazon.com/Fossil-Future-Flourishing-Requires-Gas-Not-ebook/dp/B098M3Y7VC?ref_=ast_author_dp https://www.amazon.com/Fossil-Future-Flourishing-Requires-Ga...