3 ms·
> The writing does seem to be a masters-level course in telling rather than showing. That's a failure on the part of the [author?]. When you literally ask GPT
by jstarfish 4y ago
> The writing does seem to be a masters-level course in telling rather than showing.
That's a failure on the part of the [author?]. When you literally ask GPT to tell you a story, it's going to tell you a story. The "author's" entire process is mechanical iteration-- "Make a statement. Enhance. Enhance. Enhance."
It's more "showy" when you start with "write a script about..." and massage that into a story, or add stipulations like "...go into emotional detail."
People are gaming this thing to write smut, so if the output is this bland, it's not the tech that's the problem.
- themodelplumber 4y agoWait, are we to believe that smut-style expressions of salacious content, moaning, whatever else, is the same as quality of expression in storytelling? To me those are completely different types of expression. I mean I could yawn and call it expression but qualitatively that's different... Anyway I'm not above reading AI smut if it'll clue me in. Link it if you have it.