> I think it'll do wonders in the world of office automation because it seems to have the ability to succeed at this much better than any previous "no-code" att

> I think it'll do wonders in the world of office automation because it seems to have the ability to succeed at this much better than any previous "no-code" attempt where the logic would almost always end up requiring people who are basically programmers for it to work. I think GPT will help here, requiring less "superusers" for a department to move their data flows into automation. Especially in areas, where efficiency and stability aren't necessarily that important if the automation-tools mean you don't need three full time employees moving data from one system to another. Yeah, at this point I think this is a valid use case for GPT-4 in its current form. I would be comfortable using it to build internal process tools or standalone things like a simple browser extension. Nobody in engineering at my company would be dumb enough to let me start monkey around with our actual codebase though.