Basically agree -- feels off-putting, but not technically a wrong detail to add. An additional reason it rubs me the wrong way, however, is that I believe open-

Basically agree -- feels off-putting, but not technically a wrong detail to add. An additional reason it rubs me the wrong way, however, is that I believe open-source software code is especially critical to ChatGPT family's capabilities. Not just for code-related queries, but for everything! (e.g. see this "lineage-tracing" blog post: https://yaofu.notion.site/How-does-GPT-Obtain-its-Ability-Tracing-Emergent-Abilities-of-Language-Models-to-their-Sources-b9a57ac0fcf74f30a1ab9e3e36fa1dc1#3e764cf66cd84fd481fb166ec43188ca https://yaofu.notion.site/How-does-GPT-Obtain-its-Ability-Tr...) Thus, I honestly think firms operating generative AI should be walking on eggshells to avoid placing blame on "open-source". Rather, they really should going out of their way to channel as much positive energy towards it as possible. Still, agree the charitable interpretation is that this just purely descriptive.