3 ms·
> although you could say it is unsportsmanlike. I don’t think anyone rational would agree that it was unsportsmanlike. The situation was very clear, if they w
by Kon-Peki 4y ago
> although you could say it is unsportsmanlike.
I don’t think anyone rational would agree that it was unsportsmanlike.
The situation was very clear, if they won by a single goal their season was over. The goal to make it 2-1 occurred in the 83rd minute and they didn’t adopt this strategy until the 87th minute. In those intervening 4 minutes they attempted to score and restore their 2-goal lead.
There are other examples of locally detrimental behavior that aims for strategic advantage, such as the intentional walk in baseball.
Or that sometimes in football/soccer a team will intentionally kick the ball out of bounds to stop play because of an injury to a player, and the other team responds afterward by throwing the ball in to the other team or kicking it out themselves.
- dfxm12 4y agoThis situation wouldn't be considered unsportsmanlike because of "locally detrimental" behavior per se, but because of the angle-shooting. Your examples are well established parts of their games. Intentional own goals are not.
- notahacker 4y agoI'm not sure the fact they tried to win legitimately for a few minutes before resorting to something the opposition couldn't stop them from doing to exploit a loophole in the rules makes it sound less unsportsmanlike...