3 ms·
Did you read the screenshot? It’s explaining how much gasoline or uranium a human would need to consume to survive based on caloric intake.
by 650REDHAIR 4y ago
Did you read the screenshot?
It’s explaining how much gasoline or uranium a human would need to consume to survive based on caloric intake.
- nico 4y agoSo? It would have done the same if you had used WolframAlpha directly. Garbage in -> Garbage out But ChatGPT is making it a lot easier for most people to use almost any tool directly from the chat. It’s almost like chat-based OS.
- teawrecks 4y agoWait what does GIGO have to do with it, the input and output were both reasonable.
- UncleEntity 4y agoMaybe because the “correct” answer is zero? …for certain values of correct. If it gives totally impractical answers that seems like a problem with the asker methinks. Like, what would you do with the answer to “how many deciliters of flannel would it take to cover the earth?”
- fnordpiglet 4y agoIt seems you didn’t read the chat itself. Alpha didn’t actually say the same. It said the units for uranium and calories are incompatible. To which chat gpt merrily computed a result regardless, pointing out that while you could live on uranium for 26 years it’s toxic and radioactive and ignored the steer from alpha that it’s not just ill advised it’s impossible. I think that was their point. Alpha detected garbage in and gave an error, and Chatgpt locked all humans in matrix pods and force fed them one gram of uranium every 26 years.
- teawrecks 4y agoYour point seems unrelated.