6 ms·
Even if this interpretation is correct, it only holds if the law is not changed. But the law is not immutable. My proclamation could be considered to be in ter
by feanaro 4y ago
Even if this interpretation is correct, it only holds if the law is not changed. But the law is not immutable.
My proclamation could be considered to be in terms of what ought to be, in order for society to be just and to prevent a disproportionate accumulation of power in ultra large corporations, which is detrimental to society.
- microtonal 4y agoWell that's not the way you stated. But I completely agree that that's the way it ought to be.