your analogy to breaking into a site is very valid here, which gives me pause. But one way I would look at it is that if, let's say, Apple were to produce a gr

your analogy to breaking into a site is very valid here, which gives me pause. But one way I would look at it is that if, let's say, Apple were to produce a great piece of software and say "you have to come to Cupertino to use it" and then someone broke into the Apple's site and made that piece of software available on a P2P network, would the analogy still be valid? I agree with you communication between both sides must exist but, in this case, the tech industry is actually providing a number of LEGAL ways for Hollywood to provide its content online (either per subscription or pay-per-view) and Hollywood is still saying "NO". It feels as if only one side is trying to find a compromise here.