Sort of disappointed on the comments so far: everyone seems to want to argue the definition rather than examining the approach taken by the author, which is the

Sort of disappointed on the comments so far: everyone seems to want to argue the definition rather than examining the approach taken by the author, which is the more interesting point in the article. I'd rather see more arguments on the quality of the process (this comment seems to - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35287984 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35287984) and whether or not it works as a satisfactory means. Whether or not you agree with the answer is secondary.