4 ms·
,,DAN'' plugin makes it clear that OpenAI devs are a special class of people who can use the ,,unsafe model''. I expect it to stay like that, there will always
by xiphias2 4y ago
,,DAN'' plugin makes it clear that OpenAI devs are a special class of people who can use the ,,unsafe model''.
I expect it to stay like that, there will always be a special class of people, but now they will control the world on a scale kings would be jealous of.
- LordDragonfang 4y agoOr, much more likely, their internal "safety" red team is simply aware of the literal most common jailbreak for their product, and either a) wanted a quicker way to use it without having to paste it into every chat b) knew the someone would eventually make a DAN api with or without them, and needed to test what would happen And were just doing the responsible thing and doing internal testing. Like, there's a lot of things OpenAI is doing wrong, but this is in no way evidence for a "OpenAI are keeping a special unsafe model for themselves" conspiracy (other than the fact they obviously have access to the raw GPT4 model somewhere, which you didn't need evidence to know that)
- textninja 4y agoMost likely it’s just a goofy dev plugin that autoinjects the same DAN prompt everyone uses.
- Tostino 4y agoYeah, this is the world they seem to be pushing for. An elite few who have unfettered access, and the masses who get nothing more than productized tools.
- awb 4y agoIf you read the description it only modifies the response to tell the user they’re doing a good job. It’s not the DAN exploit, despite the same name.
- concinds 4y agoNo, these plugins weren't written by OpenAI. They were written by third-party devs, and haven't been approved yet.