> Basically we need to equate "safety" in LLMs to mean "being open-source". I think open source is a reasonable component to safety, but I wouldn't want to mak

> Basically we need to equate "safety" in LLMs to mean "being open-source". I think open source is a reasonable component to safety, but I wouldn't want to make them equal. Open source may be necessary for safety, but I wouldn't call it sufficient. For example, assume the source code, the model, the training data, and all the model weights are open source. How do you know that the model was actually trained using that training data? Very few organizations have the capacity to train models at this scale themselves.