3 ms·
I feel bad for Bard, because to me it is a fraction of the functionality and usefulness of ChatGPT (so far). This app won't help Bard at all.
by cowmix 4y ago
I feel bad for Bard, because to me it is a fraction of the functionality and usefulness of ChatGPT (so far). This app won't help Bard at all.
- wonderfuly 4y agoIt's interesting to compare their answers though!
- VBprogrammer 4y agoYeah, I had a random idea the other day. I wanted to create a tool for myself. Basically GTD (TM) inside a ncurses Python app. I decided I wanted to have the command really quick to type so decided calling it "asdf" was a good idea but had to come up with a back-ronym to justify it. I decided to get our new AI overlords to help. Asking bard was no help what-so-ever. The best it came up with was "ASDF Tasker" with no explanation for the ASDF part. Moving to ChatGPT one of the first responses was basically that the letters of the name would stand for "add, sort, filter and delete" the main actions within the program which I honestly thought was pretty good.
- impulser_ 4y agoThe only thing Bard is better than ChatGPT at is responding more like how a human would response. Other than that Bard is very stupid compared to ChatGPT. I don't know if this is because of the "lightweight" model, but it impressive for a company with this much data, information, and computing power to release an AI as dumb as Bard. It has told me 1+1=2 is a false statement lol.