I wasn't disagreeing with the point, I just felt the urge to be nitpicky and point out that the given example doesn't prove anything. The same excuse the magaz

I wasn't disagreeing with the point, I just felt the urge to be nitpicky and point out that the given example doesn't prove anything. The same excuse the magazines use for the articles would be just as applicable with these pictures, as we thought it was legit transfers directly over to we thought they'd given permission. It's all fine legally as long as the articles are retracted for missinformation What you're thinking of is getting damages/convictions because of the misinformation. That's indeed quiet hard and will require proving that you've actually been harmed, which is extremely challenging, generally speaking.