3 ms·
When you're doing something even remotely technically interesting shared hosting isn't an option. However, if you need something for, you know, the restaurant d
by huskyr 15y ago
When you're doing something even remotely technically interesting shared hosting isn't an option. However, if you need something for, you know, the restaurant down the street, your nephew's school blog, a small shop that justs wants a Google Map and a contact form i don't think shared hosting is such a bad option.
It's really cheap ($20 for a VPS might be low for you, but it isn't for your nephew), doesn't matter that much when it's down, usually easy to set up, etc.
- josephcooney 15y agoYes. I'm not disputing the usefulness of shared hosting, in fact I called out the fact that it had originally been omitted from the list.