2 ms·
Sorry, I don’t like VCs (no specific reason, just don’t like people with tons of money), but a person’s choice of bank shouldn’t be the deciding factor in wheth
by dclowd9901 4y ago
Sorry, I don’t like VCs (no specific reason, just don’t like people with tons of money), but a person’s choice of bank shouldn’t be the deciding factor in whether or not they get to keep their money.
Do more wealthy VCs and firms have more tooling available to be able to properly vet their capital storage houses before deciding to reside there? Sure. But unless we decide that banks should be public facilities with the aim of strictly housing money, I’m not sure any amount of vetting could actually guarantee a depositor’s safety at a bank. And I just don’t think it should be your fault if your bank’s investment branch are nincompoops. You have no control over that, and certainly no degree of control from a quarter to quarter standpoint where the personnel of your bank might shift and change far past your vetting.
So would I have lost sleep if VCs lost their deposits? No. But am I glad they were made whole, even if I think they shouldn’t have that much money in the first place? Yes.
- paganel 4y agoThey were not "persons", they were "companies", and, as such, every financial-related action that such a company carries out (like choosing the shady bank instead of a well-established one) might in fact bring it down. That's how business works for companies. And SVB was a shady bank, hence why it had begun to run out of funds before the VCs started losing their minds on Twitter, and also because there are many stories of them (SVB) opening up accounts and giving lines of credit much more freely compared to an established bank or even to a more cautious "mom-and-pop" bank.