"People can claim otherwise and it may be true for a small percentage of people but if you have less than 3 years of real professional experience, 100% remote i

"People can claim otherwise and it may be true for a small percentage of people but if you have less than 3 years of real professional experience, 100% remote is a bad idea." Why three years? What about 4 years? How about 2.5 years? I'm sorry to call you out but it's incredibly frustrating than on a news aggregate site that purports to hold itself to a higher standard than alternatives like reddit, that users are still completely confident about putting forth assertions such as these with zero actual concrete quantifiable data other than anecdotal evidence.