OpenAI is, seemingly, trying to have it both ways: on one hand, they use warnings about the dangers of AI to justify their existence and practices such as keepi

OpenAI is, seemingly, trying to have it both ways: on one hand, they use warnings about the dangers of AI to justify their existence and practices such as keeping models closed, etc. And on the other hand, they're rushing towards commercialization in order to beat out their rivals. It's a bit of a BS act. Either it's bad and we should slow development way down until our frameworks for dealing with it catch up, or it's not going to turn us all into paperclips. (I'm one of those boring folks who think there's a lot of risk but not in the paperclip sense but in the "when we use tools we understand poorly, we are likely to get outcomes we may not desire in terms of fairness, trustworthiness, etc.")