4 ms·

The thing is, the price difference between this and a vps is too dramatic. For example, I can get a Lunarpages basic hosting, with "Unlimited" Bandwidth and "Un

The thing is, the price difference between this and a vps is too dramatic. For example, I can get a Lunarpages basic hosting, with "Unlimited" Bandwidth and "Unlimited" Storage for $4.99/mo with support for rails apps and python (not django however). Not to mention a free domain name. However the cheapest linode vps is $19.99/mo. I would LOVE to have a vps to play around on, I would have so much use for it and yet I'm a student living in London and all my money goes towards the cost of living. It makes much more sense for me to go with the cheaper shared hosting as I just can't afford anything more. As an aside, I found http://virpus.com/ http://virpus.com/ the other day and they are selling vps's starting at $3/mo. Does anyone have any experience at all with them?

Terretta 15y ago
Gotta love those "CPU slices" that ensure you'll never dream of touching those "unlimited" limits.
pestaa 15y ago
CloudSigma is in Europe, and has a little lower barrier to entry compared to Linode. I'm on the lookout for an even cheaper solution. Virpus seems to be almost too cheap, so where is the catch?
- experiment0 15y ago
  Thats what I'm trying to find out. TBH I'm not looking to use it for a startup, more for actually playing around with all the new stuff I see on HN. But yeah it does look a bit dodgy being SO cheap.
rudd 15y ago
I'm on the EC2 free usage tier and having no problems for my minimal use of a VPS. For just playing around and testing stuff, it's great.
- experiment0 15y ago
  Ah, I hadn't see this before! Going to register now.
stevelosh 15y ago
I've heard good things about http://prgmr.com/ http://prgmr.com/ and they have 5/6/8/12 -dollar tiers.
- MatthewPhillips 15y ago
  I use prgmr to host a website and couple of private git repos, I would definitely recommend it.
- listic 15y ago
  If the amount of traffic they offer feels adequate, good for you. Otherwise, practically anyone else will offer more traffic these days.
dspillett 15y ago
I've heard quite a few people knocking virpus for unreliability and bad support, though I've never used them myself. http://www.lowendbox.com/ http://www.lowendbox.com/ is a good resource for cheap VPS information, though be aware that I wouldn't put anything "production" on just one (I have a couple of cheap VPSs that playthings and some non-sensitive off-site backups go on, but anything of any import does not just go on one of them). Also, be wary of "burstable RAM" - more often than not it is far more trouble than it could possibly be worth (the feature might make sense in an environment where you know the likely use patterns of the whole host and its guest OSs, but it just causes problems in a shared environment IMO).
seltzered_ 15y ago
yeah. I'm currently using dreamhost shared and despite my gripes, it's not bad for the lay person. Dare I say I recommend it if you want to run a static-page driven site (e.g. jekyll / hyde / etc.) . I want to see how far they take unlimited and see if they'll handle my several-gig photo collection soon. Hell, my dad uses godaddy of all things, but at least he has his tiny wordpress site up to help his non-tech business.
- Nick_C 15y ago
  Dreamhost handle my photo collection fine. Also, Dreamhost at least gives you shell access, which is a big plus. And, contrary to a comment above, you can build your own environment. I have an up to date python 2.7 virtualenv from easy_install, and same for ruby.
listic 15y ago
The price difference between shared hosting and VPS is non-existent. http://www.lowendbox.com/ http://www.lowendbox.com/ is a site dedicated to low-end VPS offerings under $7/mo. They have tons of offers listed and guides like "Yes, You Can Run 18 Static Sites on a 64MB Link-1 VPS" (http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/yes-you-can-run-18-static-sites-on-a-64mb-link-1-vps/ http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/yes-you-can-run-18-static-site...) To be listed there, $7 should be recurring maximum price, not limited time offer. Some are really good. The real difference is not in price; it's that in shared hosting you don't get the option and associated responsibility of managing your software stack; in VPS you do.
driverdan 15y ago
Disregarding that you can get VPSes for less than that, is $20/m really that much of a problem? That's 5-7 fewer trips to the cafe, 3-4 fewer beers at the bar, or 1-2 fewer times eating out per month. If you really wanted to you could find $20/m.
scott_w 15y ago
Rackspace Cloud starts at a little over £7/month for their cheapest offering. They also give you some ability to "scale up" by simply asking for a bigger instance, and they handle moving your server over. The only real downside is the default password. Unlike AWS, you are given a root password, which is pathetically easy to crack, so the first thing you need to do is change that.

Terretta 15y ago

Gotta love those "CPU slices" that ensure you'll never dream of touching those "unlimited" limits.

pestaa 15y ago

CloudSigma is in Europe, and has a little lower barrier to entry compared to Linode. I'm on the lookout for an even cheaper solution. Virpus seems to be almost too cheap, so where is the catch?

experiment0 15y ago
Thats what I'm trying to find out. TBH I'm not looking to use it for a startup, more for actually playing around with all the new stuff I see on HN. But yeah it does look a bit dodgy being SO cheap.

rudd 15y ago

I'm on the EC2 free usage tier and having no problems for my minimal use of a VPS. For just playing around and testing stuff, it's great.

experiment0 15y ago
Ah, I hadn't see this before! Going to register now.

stevelosh 15y ago

I've heard good things about http://prgmr.com/ http://prgmr.com/ and they have 5/6/8/12 -dollar tiers.

MatthewPhillips 15y ago
I use prgmr to host a website and couple of private git repos, I would definitely recommend it.
listic 15y ago
If the amount of traffic they offer feels adequate, good for you. Otherwise, practically anyone else will offer more traffic these days.

dspillett 15y ago

I've heard quite a few people knocking virpus for unreliability and bad support, though I've never used them myself. http://www.lowendbox.com/ http://www.lowendbox.com/ is a good resource for cheap VPS information, though be aware that I wouldn't put anything "production" on just one (I have a couple of cheap VPSs that playthings and some non-sensitive off-site backups go on, but anything of any import does not just go on one of them). Also, be wary of "burstable RAM" - more often than not it is far more trouble than it could possibly be worth (the feature might make sense in an environment where you know the likely use patterns of the whole host and its guest OSs, but it just causes problems in a shared environment IMO).

seltzered_ 15y ago

yeah. I'm currently using dreamhost shared and despite my gripes, it's not bad for the lay person. Dare I say I recommend it if you want to run a static-page driven site (e.g. jekyll / hyde / etc.) . I want to see how far they take unlimited and see if they'll handle my several-gig photo collection soon. Hell, my dad uses godaddy of all things, but at least he has his tiny wordpress site up to help his non-tech business.

Nick_C 15y ago
Dreamhost handle my photo collection fine. Also, Dreamhost at least gives you shell access, which is a big plus. And, contrary to a comment above, you can build your own environment. I have an up to date python 2.7 virtualenv from easy_install, and same for ruby.

listic 15y ago

The price difference between shared hosting and VPS is non-existent. http://www.lowendbox.com/ http://www.lowendbox.com/ is a site dedicated to low-end VPS offerings under $7/mo. They have tons of offers listed and guides like "Yes, You Can Run 18 Static Sites on a 64MB Link-1 VPS" (http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/yes-you-can-run-18-static-sites-on-a-64mb-link-1-vps/ http://www.lowendbox.com/blog/yes-you-can-run-18-static-site...) To be listed there, $7 should be recurring maximum price, not limited time offer. Some are really good. The real difference is not in price; it's that in shared hosting you don't get the option and associated responsibility of managing your software stack; in VPS you do.

driverdan 15y ago

Disregarding that you can get VPSes for less than that, is $20/m really that much of a problem? That's 5-7 fewer trips to the cafe, 3-4 fewer beers at the bar, or 1-2 fewer times eating out per month. If you really wanted to you could find $20/m.

scott_w 15y ago

Rackspace Cloud starts at a little over £7/month for their cheapest offering. They also give you some ability to "scale up" by simply asking for a bigger instance, and they handle moving your server over. The only real downside is the default password. Unlike AWS, you are given a root password, which is pathetically easy to crack, so the first thing you need to do is change that.