3 ms·
Yup, kind of sucks but the end result is likely everyone and every actual living thing will suffer from this wave of “AI” because it’s an arms race now, let’s j
by ChatGTP 4y ago
Yup, kind of sucks but the end result is likely everyone and every actual living thing will suffer from this wave of “AI” because it’s an arms race now, let’s just keep burning fossil fuels and hope the thing spits out the answer to that problem ?
- jay_kyburz 4y agoHere is your answer to the fossil fuel problem. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpeODvGJE1Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpeODvGJE1Q update: found a better one.
- JCharante 4y agoThe answer already exists but people refuse to implement it.
- kodah 4y agoWe have nuclear, but a lot of Americans are concerned about nuclear for reasonable reasons. We have renewables, but those can't take up the majority capacity of a grid unless we start adding massive batteries. Then there's grid rebalancing where we incentivize people to use and store renewable energy locally, this lessening the strain on the grid but that still results in fossil fuels or nuclear. Hydro has been found to be environmentally destructive. I'm not sure if that was just my state or if that's ubiquitous. What were you thinking?
- CatWChainsaw 4y agoProbably just salivating over Dyson spheres, or whatever quantum woo-woo showed up a few news cycles ago about energy appearing "from nowhere"...
- JCharante 4y agoNuclear + solar panels everywhere
- kodah 4y agoAh, so people don't just "refuse to implement it", yeah? There's been a large number of disasters with long-term consequences and the industry is claiming it has more reliable systems, which is also what they said before many of these nuclear disasters occurred. I'm hopeful for nuclear, but they have a ways to go in proving themselves to the wider public. With that said, I think you could've positioned what you said a bit more fairly.